From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Apr 13 23:32:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA19434
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 23:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA19421
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 1997 23:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2)
	   id BAA12865; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 01:33:32 -0500
Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma012852; Mon Apr 14 06:33:14 1997
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970414012540.00d12220@mixcom.com>
X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 01:25:41 -0500
To: dg@root.com
From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <sysop@mixcom.com>
Subject: Re: Configuring kernel for Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 
Cc: rajesha@ct-yardley.com, questions@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 07:48 PM 4/13/97 -0700, David Greenman wrote:
>>I am trouble to get the kernel to recognize the Intel EtherExpress
>>PRO/100.
>...
>>		Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 (ISA)
>
>   We only have support for the PCI version of the Pro/100B. The ISA card
>is a different animal entirely and will need a new driver written for it.

<shaking head in disbelief>

What I don't understand is why a manufacturer would off an ISA 100bT card.


-------------------------------------------
Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator
jeff@mixcom.net

MIX Communications
Serving the Internet since 1990