From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 4 13:55:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE18F37B401; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DAA43F93; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h34LtRKj037452; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.5/Submit) id h34LtRiT037451; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:55:27 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Michael Lucas Message-ID: <20030404215527.GB37335@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Lucas , doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200304041951.h34JpVaX040786@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304041951.h34JpVaX040786@repoman.freebsd.org> cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:55:34 -0000 Thus spake Michael Lucas : > mwlucas 2003/04/04 11:51:31 PST > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml > Log: > "Can I install FreeBSD with only 4MB of RAM"? No. > > Remove advice to install FreeBSD 2.0.5. > > Remove 2.1.7 installation suggestion. > > Leave a reference to FreeBSD 2.1.7, only to give this asker a sense of > "We're no longer in the stone age." I'm glad someone has taken the time to clean up that part of the FAQ a bit! It seems to have been neglected for a while.