Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:47:50 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, Antony Mawer <fbsd-arch@mawer.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? Message-ID: <20060831144750.GA34402@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20060830234108.N82634@hub.org> References: <20060826132138.H82634@hub.org> <200608261848.16513.max@love2party.net> <20060826165209.V82634@hub.org> <20060828130247.GA77702@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20060828170450.M82634@hub.org> <44F39ACB.6090703@mawer.org> <20060829015306.GA6722@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <44F3A44C.8050401@mawer.org> <20060829024420.GA7169@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20060830234108.N82634@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:44:19PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > >That wouldn't be a big deal. We've got lots of B(L)AMP applications=20 > >running and plenty of FreeBSD servers to run them on. That might be an= =20 > >option for me. >=20 > What about the email system that has been discussed already? >=20 > On the first run only: >=20 > HostA emails root, root forwards that to rpt@bsdstats.org,=20 > rpt@bsdstats.org sends back text to be added to /var/db/bsdstats ... >=20 > Subsequent runs use the information in /var/db/bsdstats, emails the repot= =20 > itself to root who then forwards *that* to rpt@bsdstats.org ... >=20 > We're also going to be working on AUTH Proxy, for those that need that ... >=20 > As Antony stated, we no longer store IP/hostname, but the reporting does= =20 > require the information to get back into /var/db/bsdstats to be used for= =20 > reporting, so the "non-fetch version" would defintely be a bit more=20 > involved for the admin ... I don't understand the proposed data flow well enough to say. Unless the operation is easily automated, an action per-machine isn't going to happen. -- Brooks --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE9vaWXY6L6fI4GtQRAvDRAKDRZdIVqABXe56veFU4R8UR4zNuzwCfbMy4 O18JjDEXRf7ShETJUQXjGtA= =cWDQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831144750.GA34402>