Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:36:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defrag Message-ID: <20080828133531.I64545@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080828055600.736f3447@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <20080827172946.5a1d4103@gom.home> <6C9E353A-3008-4E28-910C-212DBB9F6E28@bsdhost.net> <200808272208.47468.mike.jeays@rogers.com> <20080828055600.736f3447@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think they probably did, NTFS took a lot from UNIX filesystems, and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
what for example?
it took 95% from OS/2 HPFS filesystem and another 5% is what microsoft
f...ed up.
> at the time it was released they said that NTFS didn't need any
> defragmentation at all.
"SAID" is most important word in Your sentence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080828133531.I64545>