From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 27 22:19:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D31537B401 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net (conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E2A43ECD for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:19:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from sdn-ap-036dcwashp0288.dialsprint.net ([65.179.113.34] helo=moo.holy.cow) by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18HI1Z-0007X7-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:19:46 -0800 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4CD55A370; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:22:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:22:33 -0500 From: parv To: Kent Stewart Cc: f-ports Subject: Re: creating ports INDEX from actual installed ports Message-ID: <20021128062232.GA11844@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Kent Stewart , f-ports References: <20021127045833.GA17350@moo.holy.cow> <5.2.0.9.2.20021126205857.00a7da30@pozo.com> <20021127200435.GB21971@moo.holy.cow> <3DE54ED2.2080401@owt.com> <20021127234212.GA62251@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021127234212.GA62251@moo.holy.cow> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org in message <20021127234212.GA62251@moo.holy.cow>, wrote parv thusly... > > in message <3DE54ED2.2080401@owt.com>, > wrote Kent Stewart thusly... > > > > parv wrote: > ... > > >...despite the errors, both indexes were made correctly. that's > > >much more than that can be said about ports own index making. > > > > I don't believe this statement. The INDEX created by "make index" is > > ~30KB larger than the one created by portsdb -U. For example, > > > > ruby# ll bak-make > > total 9568 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3053030 Nov 27 14:56 INDEX > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6723584 Nov 27 14:56 INDEX.db > > ruby# ll bak-portsdb > > total 9464 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3023522 Nov 27 13:55 INDEX > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6642688 Nov 27 13:55 INDEX.db ... > until "make index" works for me, i can only take your word that > "portsdb -U" may not be producing the right INDEX. i just have the pleasure of running "make index" after deleting ports which were causing "no entry" messages. after all the cutting & pruning, i get (6503 ports)... -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2200066 Nov 28 01:18 INDEX -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4987904 Nov 28 01:18 INDEX.db differences (in INDEX generated by index target & portsdb) were in white space save one port (& as a dependency) missed (gnome-look in case of gnome-themes) by portsdb. - parv -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message