From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Tue Jun 25 10:50:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB24815C85E6 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0584FFD for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 263E415C85E5; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1498F15C85E4 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A542284FF8 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24D7BA59 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5PAoYaA048342 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5PAoYiZ048341 for python@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238799] net/py-libdnet: Fails to make showconfig or make clean Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:50:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238799 dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa Resolution|Not A Bug |Works As Intended --- Comment #5 from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au --- (In reply to dewayne from comment #4) This port doesn't build within a jail that doesn't have /dev/bpf0. There i= s a test in configure that checks this event. I think that the better way is to NOT check for any /dev/bpf, where folks build if very low functionality jai= ls.=20 I recall years ago adding bpf to the jail for something like isc-dhcpd-serv= er or similar that must have bpf, probably for the same reason. Regardless I = have one and this takes care of it; it also provides a clue as to where the test= is, if someone would like to remove. :) --- /usr/ports/net/libdnet/Makefile (revision 505080) +++ /usr/ports/net/libdnet/Makefile (working copy) @@ -26,4 +26,7 @@ USE_LDCONFIG=3D yes .endif +post-patch: + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|/dev/bpf0|/dev/bpf|g' ${WRKSRC}/m4/ac_dnet_bsd_bpf.m4 + .include --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=