From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 12 04:42:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA27111 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 04:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id EAA27084; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 04:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA03134; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:35:28 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199709120935.LAA03134@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Do *you* have problems with floppies? To: kjk1@ukc.ac.uk (K.J.Koster) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:35:28 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "K.J.Koster" at Sep 12, 97 11:22:15 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Wild guess: driver needs to recalibrate every once in a while, so if you > write a whole floppy at once, it slowly loses calibration. MS-DOS > `recalibrates' by writing the FAT every block or so. How does that sound? I doubt it writes the fat so often, performance would be much worse than the 30-40K/s we get now... Luigi