From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Nov  9 13:32:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA06108
          for smp-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:32:09 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp)
Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06052;
          Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:31:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
	by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11187;
	Sun, 9 Nov 1997 14:31:49 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA05995; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 14:31:45 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 14:31:45 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199711092131.OAA05995@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@cs.sunyit.edu>
Cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Best processor?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971109124327.18731C-100000@server.local.sunyit.edu>
References: <9268.879084550@orion.webspan.net>
	<Pine.BSF.3.96.971109124327.18731C-100000@server.local.sunyit.edu>
X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> dual 300mhz PIIs will beat dual PPro 200mhz

>From the noise I've been hearing lately on the mailing lists, this
suprises me.  Do you have #'s to back it up?



Nate