Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:21:32 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: ade@supernews.net Cc: sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for packages Message-ID: <200203222121.g2MLLWa88390@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <B8BFFE6F.A8C7%ade@supernews.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <B8BFFE6F.A8C7%ade@supernews.net>, aDe writes: >Entries no later than 0000 CST (0600 GMT) Tuesday, 25th March, giving me >about a week (I think), to collate the entries, and start building and >patching. Please take some time to run the test suites of the various ports. This has helped me to find a number of bugs in the SPARC port, including a few general bugs that seem to only hit there. I've been building mostly shells, development tools, and suchlike. I have been able to package: autoconf-2.52_2.tgz gmake-3.79.1.tgz autoconf213-2.13.000227_1.tgz libtool-1.3.4_2.tgz automake-1.5,1.tgz m4-1.4_1.tgz bash-2.05a.tgz pdksh-5.2.14.tgz gettext-0.10.35_1.tgz zsh-4.0.4.tgz With a fixed expr(1), autoconf fails only one test, and I think it's a bug in the test. m4 passes all tests. gettext passes all tests. libtool fails a couple of tests, one of which reflects a bug in the test and one of which I've been unable to track down but is present on i386 as well. automake fails 3 of 303 tests. gmake fails a couple of tests that I haven't gotten around to examining. bash, pdksh, and zsh all run. What I'd *really*, *really* like to see is a working Emacs. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | wollman@lcs.mit.edu | History starts with a consonant. Opinions not those of| MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203222121.g2MLLWa88390>