Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 17:58:11 +0100 From: Ray Kinsella <raykinsella78@gmail.com> To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: contigmalloc & access protection failure Message-ID: <584ec6bb0905100958m1a0ee883h76eaa41eb566e033@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bc2d970905100922s4722d339mc807d210d6d13b86@mail.gmail.com> References: <584ec6bb0905100532n36ae97b1rc5e6e31c23bdb44b@mail.gmail.com> <bc2d970905100922s4722d339mc807d210d6d13b86@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ah I specified VM_PROT_ALL because I though that was "protecting" against reads/writes and executes. I had it the wrong way around, it was that VM_PROT that confused me, my kernel panic works perfectly now thanks. Regards Ray Kinsella On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, and you're passing VM_PROT_ALL -- that says "map this > read/write/execute".=A0 You want VM_PROT_READ > > Ryan Stone >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?584ec6bb0905100958m1a0ee883h76eaa41eb566e033>