From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 13:55:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF81E16A417; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8536313C442; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBTDmP9u092427; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:48:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:53:25 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20071229.065325.1716883756.imp@bsdimp.com> To: amdmi3@amdmi3.ru From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20071229130639.GA82286@hades.panopticon> References: <200712271638.lBRGcTu9071266@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071229130639.GA82286@hades.panopticon> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_bio.c vfs_mount.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:55:19 -0000 In message: <20071229130639.GA82286@hades.panopticon> Dmitry Marakasov writes: : * Warner Losh (imp@FreeBSD.org) wrote: : : > A partial solution to some of the 'pull the umass device with a : > mounted FS' problems. These are more along the lines of 'avoiding an : > avoidable panic' than a complete solution to removable devices. We : > now close the barn door after the horse has gotten lose and has been : > hit by a truck, as it were. The barn no longer catches fire in this : > case, but the horse is still dead :-). : Cool, but won't that affect hard drives too? I mean when my hdd drive : goes offline, what I want is panic, to prevent possible [more] data : loss. If this commit affects anything besides removeable devices, my : opinion is this behavior should be reconsidered, or at least made : tunable. Or am I missing something? You don't want a panic like this... Warner