From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:18:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A984B2D139; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0391D173E; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.225.51.85] (nat-eduroam-st-106.fh-muenster.de [194.95.73.106]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FA48721E281E; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r298187 - head/sys/netinet From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <20160503230336.GD1369@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:18:19 +0200 Cc: Ian Lepore , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3FA0A836-A54A-419E-B910-7B32BF934FF5@freebsd.org> References: <201604180638.u3I6cs5P043229@repo.freebsd.org> <1460992087.52955.47.camel@freebsd.org> <0BC0F7D1-9523-4FE6-A6ED-57372CC80206@freebsd.org> <20160503230336.GD1369@FreeBSD.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:18:24 -0000 > On 04 May 2016, at 01:03, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >=20 > Michael, >=20 > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:56:29PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 06:38 +0000, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> >> Author: tuexen > M> >> Date: Mon Apr 18 06:38:53 2016 > M> >> New Revision: 298187 > M> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298187 > M> >>=20 > M> >> Log: > M> >> Don't use anonymous unions. > M> >>=20 > M> >=20 > M> > Why not? This is one of those commit messages that really needs = to say > M> Because the same code is used in a userland SCTP stack and that > M> uses C99. Anonymous unions are introduced in C11. That's why. >=20 > This explanation of course emerges next question :) > Why don't enable C11 when compiling the userland SCTP stack? Since this is used (meaning compiled) by other projects which have its = own constraints and which I don't control... Best regards Michael >=20 > --=20 > Totus tuus, Glebius.