From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 30 20:58:41 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA12858 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 20:58:41 -0800 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA12851 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 20:58:34 -0800 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA00273; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 12:58:31 +0800 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 12:58:31 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: Re: What happened to my include files!@# In-Reply-To: <1807.796605960@freefall.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 30 Mar 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > 2). Many passwd file operations do not now work, including the passwd(1) > > command. > > Yes, somehow the suid permissions got all screwed up somehow and don't > work. I've had numerous reports of this one. [...] > Yes, you need to add suid root bits. Is this because /usr/bin/passwd wasn't archived correctly or something later on in the distribution fiddles with the permission bits? I checked my /usr/bin/passwd and it is mode 4555 without any intervention from me. > At this point, the number of errors in 950322-SNAP has exceeded what I > believe to be acceptable in a snapshot. Sorry, Poul, but that's > really how I feel about it. ... > > How do the rest of -hackers feel? I didn't have any serious problems upgrading from 950210 to this snapshot, so I won't comment either way on this. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org