From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 19 16:38:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA10143 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:38:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA10089 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12512; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:38:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: "Lee Crites (AEI)" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCO (was Re: hi terry) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:24:52 CST." Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 16:38:12 -0800 Message-ID: <12508.890354292@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > But the industry is changing quite rapidly. I believe we need to > step back and see where it is going and make some strategic > decisions about where we want to see FreeBSD go. We have > stability and security pretty well taken care of. I'm seeing > some positive comments about smp in 3.0. But we might want to > see about clustering and some fault-tolerant extensions. If we Heh. I think we first mentioned clustering as something on FreeBSD's wishlist as early as 1995 or so. The problem here is not in finding enough people to say "yeah, clustering is cool!", the problem here is in finding people to say "clustering is cool, please check out my FreeBSD implementation!" :-( Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message