From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri May 17 18:06:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA07318
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 18:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.think.com (Mail1.Think.COM [131.239.33.245])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA07312
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 May 1996 18:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Early-Bird-1.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Fri, 17 May 96 21:04:58 -0400
Received: from compound.Think.COM by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Fri, 17 May 96 21:04:54 EDT
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.Think.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA00295; Fri, 17 May 1996 20:04:48 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 20:04:48 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199605180104.UAA00295@compound.Think.COM>
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
To: terry@lambert.org
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ip masquerading
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

  From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
  Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 14:23:27 -0700 (MST)

  > AFAIK, FreeBSD doesn't provide this capability.  I doubt it ever will, since 
  > IP masqerading was considered "evil" by some of the group :-) 

  Actually, the only people who believe that it is evil are those
  of us who believe FreeBSD should comply with IETF standards

What IETF standard would be violated by IP masquerading?