From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:40:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4E71065672 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (mx.npubs.com [209.66.100.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342EF8FC1C for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (avhost [209.66.100.194]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2368C2A87; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from northstar-srv2 (unknown [172.27.2.11]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82348C2A65; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:13:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Stef Walter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harti Brandt References: <20090120012053.4D5358C2A76@mx.npubs.com> <61b573980901200200g4ff6ff16r39c2e07c5459406@mail.gmail.com> <20090120134230.U58797@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20090121021331.E82348C2A65@mx.npubs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" , Shteryana Shopova Subject: Re: bsnmp module for monitoring network flows: bsnmp-pcap X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:40:23 -0000 Harti Brandt wrote: > I probably missed something here. Any other conflicts? Can we move bsnmp-pcap > to 207? And does bsnmp-jails conflict with something? Like Shteryana said, it seems like it does conflict... Would it work to have 1111 and 1112? I used those while the software was in development (blush) and it's deployed as such on a couple dozen production servers I've been running bsnmp-jails and bsnmp-pcap on. If not, then any other two numbers are fine. Once I hear officially, I'll roll new releases. Cheers, Stef Walter