From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 11:04:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 91B4B16A4FF; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:04:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A95616A4FC; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3515243DC3; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kB7B2Pf7080985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:02:26 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id kB7B2P1W080984; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:02:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:02:25 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Paolo Pisati Message-ID: <20061207110225.GU32700@FreeBSD.org> References: <200612062319.kB6NJgsq031755@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612062319.kB6NJgsq031755@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 111230 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:04:41 -0000 On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:19:42PM +0000, Paolo Pisati wrote: P> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111230 P> P> Change 111230 by piso@piso_newluxor on 2006/12/06 23:19:06 P> P> To workaround a problem when an mbuf is bigger than MCLBYTES P> (and thus not handled by m_megapullup()), introduce & use P> m_jumbo16pullup() that uses 16k jumbo size cluster. P> P> This problem only showed up on traffic generated on a box with P> a nic tso enabled. Paolo, this isn't a fix. Another application will do write(,, 16k + 1) and m_jumbo16pullup() will fail again. Please backout it, it is a hack. We need to fix TSO in such way that real packets, that will be transmitted to wire, will be passed to pfil handlers. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE