From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 12 5:40:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDBB37B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:40:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0CDe2740922; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:40:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:40:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101121340.f0CDe2740922@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Thomas Gellekum Subject: Re: ports/24231: Pyton 2.0: Add support for building pyexpat.so Reply-To: Thomas Gellekum Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/24231; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas Gellekum To: "Alexander N. Kabaev" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, ak03@gte.com Subject: Re: ports/24231: Pyton 2.0: Add support for building pyexpat.so Date: 11 Jan 2001 15:10:24 +0100 "Alexander N. Kabaev" writes: > Why didn't you separate gmp and OpenSSL parts using the same logic? The necessary gmp and SSL sources are part of the base system and the support can be compiled in without any {WANT,WITHOUT}_* options and without external dependencies. It's easy enough to create another port for more granularity and I prefer that way over make options. We have too many of those already. tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message