Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Aug 2024 23:23:34 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 280705] 0.0.0.0/32 is equivalent to 127.0.0.1/32, which may be considered a security flaw
Message-ID:  <bug-280705-7501-8yhGaQCHUG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-280705-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-280705-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280705

--- Comment #6 from paul vixie <paul@redbarn.org> ---
It has always been the case that if you bind to inaddr_any your socket will=
 be
available on all host interface addresses, and if you connect or sendto
inaddr_any you'll reach some socket bound to some host interface address. In
that sense yes this will be a breaking change. However, it's "good trouble"=
 and
we should follow openbsd's lead on the matter.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280705-7501-8yhGaQCHUG>