From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 12 12:50:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA8216A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:50:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9862043D41
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:50:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7])	(authenticated bits=0)
	iBCCnuSS034250
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:49:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12])
	by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBCCnKCE079715
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:49:21 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBCCnKsu090991;
	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:49:20 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBCCnH4w090990;
	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:49:17 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:49:17 +0100
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To: Aurelien Nephtali <aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr>
Message-ID: <20041212124916.GU63234@cicely12.cicely.de>
References: <12573.1102852732@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<41BC3943.1050700@wanadoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41BC3943.1050700@wanadoo.fr>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.64
X-Spam-Report: 
	* -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on cicely12.cicely.de
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] NTFS patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:50:01 -0000

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:27:47PM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> >That's just "normal" dirty filesystems.  It should fix itself once
> >bgfsck completes.
> >
> 
> Yes I know. But after a _clean_ reboot/halt, the filesystems aren't 
> supposed to be clean ? I wasn't seeing this "behaviour" before.

If you reboot befor bgfsck completes they are still unclean.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
bernd@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de