From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 26 07:55:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEB216A4B3; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E9044028; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:55:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost.nic.fr [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8QEtTgk098664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:55:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8QEtTQc098661; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:55:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:55:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200309261455.h8QEtTQc098661@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "David Schwartz" In-Reply-To: References: <200309250710.41607.davidxu@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: deischen@freebsd.org cc: davidxu@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:55:32 -0000 < said: > think '-pthread' is a good thing. It's nice to have a portable way to say > that I want to compile POSIX code. What good is a standard if there's no > standard way to get to it? The Standard way to do it is: c99 foo.c -l pthread -GAWollman