From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 21:54:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BFC106566B; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC388FC12; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so4582398wgb.31 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rbbRVVZ2JPARBwyFQOFW8G1adL4TZAU55+QnGnJtxT4=; b=ggVIvmXNCpNS8YkL0pzNeJBnTgZwm8Ta0y8psI2m3Leq8W142SWvlb2UN+tqA2jQT4 gti1PQCKaQtscJVYY6dUjPsc/lx98Pbj+vAmPZp4LT8js8YgfJ7WRMsAQnrUaBm4VGj7 vJL1rMxYoVaeNOktfpcaNk6RdmY15aIjtsOs3Zxos9aNkAsultFpcF0S05aNXn5V9B1x f4P3wlzh+9MyrQE0zwiWWh+do/9GbcY2vU9Dh8nUSzo/SqIY8FzK+doRVxx8LgJJ4Rmd LDf8+sTovnuXvtp9J5Aals7FJTW4HB0d0Grnk6+wM5G1KlBeGvPa/r5YBdItasOr9vuU U46w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr4133424wib.3.1334526847674; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.114.79 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:54:07 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vitaly Magerya To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: OPTIONS-NG (was: port variants) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:54:09 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > I hope things will change once we get OPTIONS-NG in, since the new > framework will address (AFAIK) all the objections people have against > our current OPTIONS. Is that a thing in existence? Is there anywhere I can read about it?