From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 23 17: 9:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692A37B942 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:09:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA37087; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:09:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA45855; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:09:46 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003240109.SAA45855@harmony.village.org> To: David Kanter Subject: Re: C++ writing/compiling with 3.4 stable Cc: FreeBSD stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:11:53 CST." <20000323181153.A88716@localhost.localdomain> References: <20000323181153.A88716@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:09:46 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000323181153.A88716@localhost.localdomain> David Kanter writes: : How ANSI/ISO-compliant is 3.4 stable? I ask because compiling a C++ program : I just wrote needed the header files with the .h extension, and didn't like : using namespace std; : : And which version of gcc should I use? There is a 2.95 (egcs) and 2.8.1 : (gcc) but the glibstdc++ seems to want 2.8.1 Use 2.95. 2.8.1 is better than 2.7, but still has some significant issues in the dark corners of the language. Don't worry about glibstdc++... It has been subsumed by libstdc++. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message