From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 18:39:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D4E16A400 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ksbeattie@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11C213C48C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ksbeattie@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so2435578nfc for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Cv6lUXU20O8UI0AtdhYD28v6UC2J6tSymj8CdaDWCigS1DCFwo1Ly3V7cFVW7u0cRr+80d72ghgacS1bThUzeAHw3Wh6LUwEWRBaUKvWOEfGG2SXtKxIkUm5FP/YpiL7/EjzbyE+e9SxSAWKFQN0wqPr2LGTsDTA1aDTH+VxBBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ieD+Tuw/qHCGSv2lZCHbB9NKqTZhbEgQ0/NkcUsXgl1B3fhj3EY6cb8xZsh4NySbgzPYVgk41skzVAfbDs+MPlUqNqlnhHc556llxqZ9V9H9d8n+PieqqPFklIvpa6/mdSjdKGx8caz7pSeHJoGb48LAMqbxeyIjw5/+EF34pLs= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr2633119huf.1174846507978; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.33.6 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aa28e230703251115g73232009le3fd7a83cfb5566b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:15:07 -0700 From: "Keith Beattie" To: "Dino Vliet" In-Reply-To: <34166.2356.qm@web51109.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <34166.2356.qm@web51109.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -rf gettext problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:38 -0000 On 3/22/07, Dino Vliet wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I saw this in usr/ports/UPDATING: > > 20070318: > AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (ie: YOU) > AUTHOR: ade@FreeBSD.org > > As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.16.1, the shared library version > of libintl has changed, so you will need to rebuild all ports that > depend on gettext (ie: most of them, sorry). > > portupgrade -rf gettext > > > When I issued this last command, portupgrade -rf gettext I get this > result: > > ---> Packages processed: 182 done, 0 ignored, 79 skipped and 7 failed > ** Could not clean up temporary directory: Directory not empty - > /var/tmp/portupgradeRtIfghsG > > So, what to do next? Should I continue this command until all packages are > processed and none of them skipped and failed? Or can I continue upgrading > all my ports as from now? Rather than having it rebuild again the 182 that did succeed, as the above command would do, I used: portupgrade -rf gettext -x '>=gettext' to have it pick up where it left off in all the gettext rebuilding. To see what that list would be (and in the order they'd be rebuilt), I used: pkg_glob -r gettext -x '>=gettext' | pkg_sort ksb