From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 22:06:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABEC16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:06:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 62-15-211-171.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-211-171.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.211.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9BD43D2F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) j3QM5wED022664; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:05:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j3QM5uxN021047; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:05:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:05:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200504261143.55195.josemi@redesjm.local> <200504262347.39919.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050426220020.GA8621@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20050426220020.GA8621@ns1.xcllnt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504270005.56024.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.7; VDF: 6.30.0.116; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: rigth crc32 implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:06:03 -0000 El Mi=E9rcoles, 27 de Abril de 2005 00:00, Marcel Moolenaar escribi=F3: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:47:38PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > So, what about add those 2/3 functions. I'll prefer this to carry > > another private version of crc32. > > I'll add crc32_raw() and rewrite the existing crc32() to use it. > Give me a day or so. I'd like to have at least crc32() inlined. > Maybe crc32_raw() as well. Both are trivial functions and there > may be an advantage to have them inlined. If only to remove the > performance argument against unification. > > FYI, NOPE, I still have things in my TODO for a month or so. =2D- josemi