From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  9 18:59:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D27316A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Dec 2003 18:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5482243D2B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Dec 2003 18:59:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBA2xVRm034287;
	Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:59:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBA2xUET034286;
	Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:59:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:59:30 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
Message-ID: <20031210025930.GA34162@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <20031206171511.GA23158@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
	<20031207131034.X7085@carver.gumbysoft.com>
	<20031207230044.GA6169@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
	<20031208180718.GA49355@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20031209181920.GD19222@dragon.nuxi.com>
	<20031209191252.GA39883@pit.databus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031209191252.GA39883@pit.databus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: last cvs Makefile.inc1 errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:59:34 -0000

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:12:52PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:19:20AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I've been meaning to ask this for a while... why does everyone recomend:
> > 
> >     make buildworld
> >     make buildkernel
> >     make installkernel
> >     make installworld
> > vs.
> >     make buildworld
> >     make kernel
> >     make installworld
> 
> I can think of two reasons:  First, the separate steps make it possible
> to do make reinstallkernel when one does not want to overwrite kernel.old.

Your sequence is:
    make buildworld
    make buildkernel
    make reinstallkernel
    make installworld

which is not what we suggest in UPDATING and not what I have above.
Please stick to the exact sequence above.