From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Sep 12 00:46:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA13794
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA13782
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA12835; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org>
cc: Tom <tom@sdf.com>,
        "J. Weatherbee - Chief Systems Engineer" <root@acromail.ml.org>,
        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Stupid Routing Situation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:22:55 PDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.96.970911231856.554B-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> 
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:46:02 -0700
Message-ID: <12831.874050362@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Can you give me an example by possibly sending out netstat -r and
> ifconfig -a i have a 255.255.255.192 maybye I want to have like 8
> computers on the segment between firewall and router (unprotected) and the
> others 56 on the second segment (protected), I don't understand why I am
> so confused as to how to do this, it is kind of nonstandard --- someone
> mentioned using rfc 1918 addresses for the firewall interface and router
> but I am pretty sure my router must use a "real" ip.

Can we discuss this in -questions please?  This is *really* not
FreeBSD-hackers material and I don't care to read it here.

					Jordan