Date: 19 Feb 98 00:05:07 +0100 From: leifn@image.dk (Leif Neland) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rcs Message-ID: <abe_9802190014@swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 18 Feb 98 23:24:12 Dave Bodenstab wrote regarding Re: rcs DB>> I have to checkout 1.59.1.18, rename it, checkout 1.59, delete DB> it and rename DB>> 1.59.1.18 back and check it in as 1.60, then remove the lock DB> for 1.59.1.18. DB> DB> Whoa!!!! What's the matter with (assuming your rcs files are in DB> the same directory -- if not, modify appropriately): DB> DB> co -r1.59.1 *,v DB> rcs -l1.59 *,v DB> ci -r1.60 *,v As I have the rcs-files in a subdir under the current (This is a dos-port of rcs), this doesn't apply. DB> This, of course, assumes that all files have changed. If not, DB> then prune out the DB> un-changed files before checking in 1.60 with: I currently only have one source, but if I had more, i wouldn't mind the release-sources all had the same version number. Or perhaps I should just use symbolic names. Can a particular version have more symbolic names, e.g. both RELJUN1997 and RELJAN1998, if this source didn't change, but other sources in the same project did? Leif Neland leifn@image.dk --- |Fidonet: Leif Neland 2:234/49 |Internet: leifn@image.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?abe_9802190014>