From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 31 10:49:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C831CFE;
 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:49:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.citrix.com",
 Issuer "Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E05999C;
 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:49:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,764,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="115219661"
Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL02.citrite.net)
 ([10.9.154.239])
 by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2014 10:49:27 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.79)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4;
 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:49:26 -0400
Message-ID: <5339482E.9020301@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:49:18 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com>, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Terrible performance of XenServer 6.2 and FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
 guest
References: <CAHcXP+eLEKP+rZ5gXo_fg1Q_jQQ7-G-_E8Bn5co-FjvSV2G22Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <8FDB514D-1A94-48B2-AE19-62923F327938@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAHcXP+do3xx+RUjtgRnCooNXnzFm5xMcPDvuwrLawZ_Gk7fc6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcXP+do3xx+RUjtgRnCooNXnzFm5xMcPDvuwrLawZ_Gk7fc6g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DLP: MIA1
Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:49:37 -0000

On 29/03/14 14:30, Big Lebowski wrote:
> This was enabled, but I've now disabled it. However, the network I/O seems
> to be ok, on par with what I can achieve on Linux boxes. Its disk I/O that
> makes the system unusable.

I've done a `tar -Jxf src.txz` on identical boxes (which I think should
generate a similar IO workload to what you are doing), one running
FreeBSD natively, and the other running a FreeBSD PVHVM guest on top of Xen:

Native:
# time tar -Jxf src.txz

real	2m15.280s
user	0m10.021s
sys	0m5.257s

Xen guest:
# time tar -Jxf src.txz

real	3m13.366s
user	0m11.430s
sys	0m4.767s

Which doesn't look that bad. When running under Xen I didn't experience
any kind of noticeable slowness while running this workload on screen
and switched to another console.

If you think disk IO is the culprit, could you provide some synthetic
workload with fio that can reproduce this? (Also the dmesg of the
FreeBSD guest might be of interest)

My test was done using OSS Xen 4.5 and a Linux Dom0 running kernel 3.13.

Roger.