From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 00:25:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082D916A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:25:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3D443D1D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4212C37965; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 19:25:43 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: 1TBs7dbBTvspask0MJVrgw 1099959939 Received: from sparky (24.229.152.161.res-cmts.sm.ptd.net [24.229.152.161]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C8D570364; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 19:25:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 19:25:40 -0500 To: "Jerry McAllister" , TM4526@aol.com References: <200411082329.iA8NTi808870@clunix.cl.msu.edu> From: Jud Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200411082329.iA8NTi808870@clunix.cl.msu.edu> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.60 (Win32, build 7299) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difference between releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:25:46 -0000 On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:29:43 -0500 (EST), Jerry McAllister wrote: [snip] >> My only point was that a "Release" should not be "just another >> snapshot", there >> should be some "plan". [snip] > It is more than just another snapshot. It is a special snapshot that > has things frozen and tested in place to make sure they all work together > at that level - sort of a barrier condition. Daily snapshots do not have > that barrier condition, but are merely a dump of the source files as they > are at the moment. [snip] The 5.3-RELEASE announcement contains several links that provide good information regarding its features and bugs, such as both are known after an extended period of real-world testing. See and . With this and other available information (e.g., mailing list discussions over the weeks of testing, and the source code itself for those capable and interested), users are free to decide for themselves which if any version of FreeBSD they wish to run. As a desktop user responsible only to myself, I have found -CURRENT to be more than sufficiently stable for my needs. If I ran a server and were responsible to others, I might decide that the most recent 4.x version, 5.3-RELEASE, or the 5.3-plus-security-and-other-critical-fixes branch fit my needs better. Jud