From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 13:25:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A8416A4CE; Thu, 6 May 2004 13:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFA843D45; Thu, 6 May 2004 13:25:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7447517F4A; Thu, 6 May 2004 15:25:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 15:25:13 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040506202513.GZ34693@sirius.firepipe.net> References: <200404160124.i3G1OlUd067575@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040416163635.GB49780@madman.celabo.org> <4080151C.1070200@fillmore-labs.com> <20040416173857.GA50670@madman.celabo.org> <20040416174418.GC50670@madman.celabo.org> <40802354.3030202@fillmore-labs.com> <20040417152242.GA5543@madman.celabo.org> <20040506190729.GD1777@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7EcdJGVUOqBBKNlB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040506190729.GD1777@madman.celabo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/pkg_install-devel Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:25:14 -0000 --7EcdJGVUOqBBKNlB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:07:29PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > Is anyone besides Oliver and myself interested in package version > number reform? I'd really like to produce a `better' set of rules > for the handbook that eliminates some of the edge cases, and then > re-version the relatively few ports that don't fit the rules. >=20 > Oliver's PR is as good a starting point as any that I've seen--- it > goes further than our current rules and only conflicts with them in > one case. I missed your original message. I have discussed his PR with him in private to some extent. Regards, --=20 wca --7EcdJGVUOqBBKNlB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAmp8pF47idPgWcsURAlOaAJ9ov8N5eYu5TsyacAdLHl7zl8O1SACcCO1O 9KT6x5KAvr4/pr5h2L+Yh2w= =JtY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7EcdJGVUOqBBKNlB--