From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 17 18:37:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB82106567C for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamk@voicenet.com) Received: from spamfish.visualtech.com (h-67-102-187-40.phlapafg.covad.net [67.102.187.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA2B8FC08 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamk@voicenet.com) Received: from mailstore.visualtech.com (unknown [67.102.187.41]) by spamfish.visualtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EB41F44A3; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:29:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from memory.visualtech.com (h-67-103-204-242.phlapafg.covad.net [67.103.204.242]) by mailstore.visualtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08664ADC25E; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:44:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:34:04 -0500 From: Adam K Kirchhoff To: "Paul B. Mahol" Message-ID: <20090217133404.22275b25@memory.visualtech.com> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750902171022t74ac8b9am3b8b3bc283a6e46d@mail.gmail.com> References: <200902171720.n1HHKkIf071491@freefall.freebsd.org> <3a142e750902171022t74ac8b9am3b8b3bc283a6e46d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-visualtech-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, weongyo@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/131781: [ndis] ndis keeps dropping the link X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:37:01 -0000 On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100 "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781 > > This one should not happen, 108 rate should get recognized. > I will try to reproduce it on CURRENT. > > To OP, could you try 7 STABLE after 31 Jan? I guess it should not > change anything but you never know. Sorry, I must have copied and pasted the uname output from the wrong machine. This is actually FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #4: Mon Feb 16 16:37:18 EST 2009 :-) Could the fact that the rate is 108 also be causing problems for the native iwi driver? Adam -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.