From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 14 22:59:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA10331 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 22:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obie.softweyr.ml.org ([199.104.124.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA10325 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 22:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.ml.org (8.7.5/8.6.12) id AAA17883; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 00:04:41 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 00:04:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199708150604.AAA17883@obie.softweyr.ml.org> From: Wes Peters To: Ken McKittrick CC: questions@freebsd.org Subject: mount -o asynch = better performance ??????? In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ken McKittrick writes: > How reliable is a file system if it's mounted asynch really???? Just as reliable as they are on Linux, where it is the default: NOT VERY! -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com