Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:39:43 +0100 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Subject: Re: /usr/home vs /home Message-ID: <20120218123943.147a7842.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F3F80FD.8070201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F3ECF23.5000706@fisglobal.com> <20120217234623.cf7e169c.freebsd@edvax.de> <3D08D03C85ACFBB1ABCDC5DA@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202172316230.11247@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <20120218112252.772c878b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F3F80FD.8070201@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:44:13 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > BTW I was intending to put across the concept of /usr being user related > - anything a user may need or use; as opposed to / for the system > related stuff that keeps it running. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I had > thought... :) There's lots of philosophy, tradition and vanished differentiation in this field. The manpage "man hier" provides a good explaination for the layout chosen for FreeBSD. However, there are questions that may arise: What kind of programs? Those called by users, by the system, or by other programs (see libexec)? What's the difference between /bin and /sbin, same for /usr/bin and /usr/sbin? Could they maybe be merged when their functionality is similar and they reside on the same partition (file system) anyway? The /etc directory - "editable text configuration" :-) - historically also contained binaries like /etc/mount or /etc/GETTY. Depending on its location, one can assume that it controls OS things only. Wrong. In many cases, /etc/rc.conf also contains settings for enabling services installed by ports. Even though FreeBSD can use /etc/rc.conf.local (has been known in OpenBSD for non-OS setup stuff), most things are found in the system-wide file. But the corresponding start scripts are in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Why no /usr/local/etc/rc.conf? But as rc.conf is just a file to associate variables with names, there's no problem if they are defined, but not used (e. g. in a limited system state after encountering a problem)... Luckily, most software installed from ports keeps its settings out of /etc and uses /usr/local/etc instead. Having _known_ locations for settings makes it easy to back them up. How about X on desktops? /etc/X11 is the common location for config files (if used), but per deduction, they should be in /usr/local/etc/X11 as X is a port, not a part of the OS. What about the configuration of xdm? Why isn't it stored in some /usr/local/etc subtree, but instead /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/ is used? This short list is just to mention the loads of philosophy hidden within the system. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120218123943.147a7842.freebsd>