From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 15 11:19:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1516A4CE; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F7243DA9; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:19:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) j4FBJmfw064015; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:19:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4FBJluX040277; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:19:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4FBJlYt040276; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:19:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:19:47 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050515111947.GA40261@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <4286E6A5.4030902@freebsd.org> <97079.1116154766@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97079.1116154766@critter.freebsd.dk> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Jacques Vidrine cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Colin Percival cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.c src/sys/amd64/include cpufunc.h src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include cpufunc.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 11:19:50 -0000 On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote.. > In message <4286E6A5.4030902@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival writes: > >Nate Lawson wrote: > >> That is at best, hyperbole. > > > >Have you been talking to Intel lately? > > > >> Crypto implementations which properly > >> implement blinding or operate in constant time are not vulnerable. > > > >Crypto implementations which implement blinding are vulnerable. > > This is not just about crypto. > > There are many processes which a random process should not be allowed > to spy on in a multiuser system. > > Your boss text-procssing or email program for one thing. Or the other way around for that matter :) -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org