From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 6 20:23:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B9116A4DA for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B3A43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:23:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g2so1140229nfe for ; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:23:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lpaa9DVL77YDVF+l74N+gP02Mka27xNFal/lEogpE2U6KyE5M8ERBjTxEhK8ksyjbJrvpJz2zJX0mTz08DkVWze+3aDII1uwWzHE83Z0ICXMsm9btsJCAbUvi2lBIk3bgX/vcV/e4A8+5ok7RWdWBEoCcrVFTeIB6e3JAOyNXI0= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr2183702hud; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.185.3 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e0608061323j4bb68fbbibcc7af4b8f4fa687@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:23:23 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: Freminlins In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44D14C43.10957.1C8B605A@rabing.omc.net> <20060803001240.41813.qmail@web34508.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <72cf361e0608051235n5c0e70fobc6f6caad8eeec69@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4TB filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:23:33 -0000 OK I stand corrected... softupdates "reduces" the possibility of having to fsck a filesystem.... ;-) -- Martin On 8/5/06, Freminlins wrote: > > On 05/08/06, Martin Hepworth wrote: > > > > Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and > > unclean umount..... > > > > No it doesn't. Absolutely not. > > After an unclean shutdown fsck runs in the background. And sometimes it > can't do that. Here's an example: > > Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck: /dev/amrd0s1g: CANNOT CREATE SNAPSHOT > /d1/.snap/fsck_snapshot: File too large > Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck: > Jul 23 17:54:01 zoe fsck: /dev/amrd0s1g: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN > fsck MANUALLY. > > > The /etc/defaults/rc.conf file has a comment on this too: > background_fsck="YES" # Attempt to run fsck in the background where > possible. > > > Frem. >