From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 1 14:19:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06974 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 14:19:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06969 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 14:19:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by cimlogic.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id GAA10427; Fri, 2 Oct 1998 06:54:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199810012054.GAA10427@cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: Threading man pages. In-Reply-To: <19981001140502.A260@kublai.com> from Brian Cully at "Oct 1, 98 02:05:02 pm" To: shmit@kublai.com Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 06:53:24 +1000 (EST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Cully wrote: > I want to modify some of the FreeBSD man pages to reflect behaviour > in a Multi Threaded environment (have a look at the Solaris man > pages for signals for an example of what I mean). If I did the > work, would it be committed? I ask, because I don't think that the > pthreads stuff in libc_r is `officially' supported, and we may not > want to put pointers in regular system man pages that hint that it > is officially supported. What do you mean by "officially supported"? -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message