From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 27 09:12:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5378216B404; Sat, 27 May 2006 09:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6459943D5D; Sat, 27 May 2006 09:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4R9Cbew008330; Sat, 27 May 2006 13:12:37 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 13:12:37 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: "Simon L. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20060527090914.GB1065@zaphod.nitro.dk> Message-ID: <20060527131045.T82623@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <200605261021.k4QALmRa046669@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060527125944.G82623@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060527090914.GB1065@zaphod.nitro.dk> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 27 May 2006 13:12:38 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/internal new-account.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:13:01 -0000 On Sat, 27 May 2006, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: SLN> > GS> - Change admins@ to accounts@, since the former is closed due to SLN> > GS> a lot of spam. SLN> > GS> - Do not use full form of accounts@ email address, to avoid spam SLN> > GS> harvesting of this address. SLN> > SLN> > What wonders me a bit is that I did not find any announcement for this even on SLN> > closed mailing list. SLN> SLN> It changed half a year or so ago after admins started getting 1000+ SLN> bounces a day. People writing admins will get a reply telling them SLN> where to direct their email. Ah, thanks for clarification. So, I suppose glebius@ apparently had to contact admins, got this reply and decided to document it somewhere ;-) However, doesn't this auto-reply provoke spammers to think admins@ is still workable mail address? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------