From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 15:01:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9773716A4CE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:01:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6487D43D1D for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:01:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 53589 invoked by uid 1252); 6 Feb 2004 23:01:04 -0000 Date: 6 Feb 2004 18:01:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:01:04 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20040206230104.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040206205133.GM3365@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:01:08 -0000 >> (02.06.2004 @ 1619 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.5K: << > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:51:33 -0500, Adam Weinberger > wrote: > > >okay, i'm seeing a problem in my latest 2.5 build, and i am only on a > >quick break between classes so i cannot investigate. but, here's the > >deal (this is from a 2.5 system, but it might be true of a 2.4 system > >too): > > > >gnome2-power-tools depends upon libsmb.so, to be installed as part of > >gnomevfs-extras. on my latest run, gnomevfs-extras never got installed. > > > >turns out gnomevfs2 built (and i assume installed) a libsmb.so. i don't > >know if gnomevfs-extras also builds one and it conflicts, or what. > > Umm, weird.. gnome2-power-tools should install gnomevfs-extras, because > there's no conflict in between gnomevfs2 and gnomevfs-extras. I just > installed gnome2-power-tools and it does install the libsmb.so. Right. I know it's supposed to. But on a clean 2.5 build/install on a clean system, gnomevfs-extras did not get built because ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so already existed. And it looked from my build logs that it was devel/gnomevfs2 that probably installed that file. I'm trying to understand if this is reproducable behaviour. > >1) does gnomevfs2 install libsmb.so? > > Nope, but FreeBSD does. Here has 5.2-CURRENT and Gnome 2.5.x, btw.. > > ======================== > # ls /usr/lib | grep smb > libsmb.a > /usr/lib/libsmb.so > /usr/lib/libsmb.so.1 > > # ls /usr/X11R6/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ | grep smb > [...empty...] > ======================== > > I don't have gnomevfs-extra install, so I don't have any libsmb.so from > Gnome stuff. Remove gnomevfs-extras, make sure that ${X11BASE}/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so doesn't exist, and then reinstall gnomevfs2. Please let me know whether or not libsmb.so is installed. > >2) does gnomevfs-extras install libsmb.so? > > Yep, it should as far it does to my system.. I just went to > x11/gnome2-power-tools and installed, so here's the result: > > ======================== > # ls /usr/X11R6/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/ | grep smb > libsmb.so > > # pkg_info | grep gnomevfs > gnomevfs-extras-0.99.13_1 A plugin for gnomevfs2 to browse smb shares with > nautilus2 > gnomevfs2-2.5.6_1 GNOME Virtual File System > > # pkg_info | grep power > gedit2-2.5.3_1 A small but powerful text editor for Gnome 2 Desktop > Enviro > gnome2-power-tools-2.5.3 "Geektoys" for the GNOME 2 power user > ======================== Right. According to our pkg-plists, that's what is supposed to happen. But they don't necessarily reflect reality, and I am trying to find out if that is the case. > >3) should gnome2-power-tools depend upon something else? > > I don't think, because it install fine to me. > > >4) does gnomevfs2 conflict with gnomevfs-extras? > > Impossible, gnomevfs-extras is designed to add stuff with gnomevfs. Right, but if they both are installing the same file, there's a conflict. > >5) is this also a problem in 2.4? > > No idea.. Can somebody test this please? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx