From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Feb 28  3:37: 1 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9DC15211
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 03:36:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA20392;
	Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:36:38 +1100
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:36:38 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199902281136.WAA20392@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: mark@grondar.za, obrien@NUXI.com
Subject: Re: gcc
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> > Hmm... Does it not make more sense to slowly remove the FreeBSD'ism
>> > that require that we futz with the compiler?
>> 
>> I don't think bde, et. al. is going to let -fformat-extensions go away.  :-)
>
>Then can't we get that put into "mainstream" gcc/egcs? 

Because extensions are extensions of the mainstream gcc/egcs, by
definition.  Format extensions that belong in the mainstream version
aren't controlled by -fformat-extensions.  E.g., the __printf0__
attribute.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message