From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 24 12:33:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA4137B511; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:33:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03710; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:33:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:33:43 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: Dan Moschuk Cc: rjk191@psu.edu, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp In-Reply-To: <20000324132303.B603@spirit.jaded.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Dan Moschuk wrote: > Oops! I've just committed the fix. No sweat! We're all busy. I'm just glad to see it done. It's something I've wanted for a long time. > It probably should be NO_UUCP, but no > one seems to want to make a final decision on the NOFOO vs. NO_FOO argument, > so I left it at NOUUCP for now. heh...I know that feeling. Doug (wondering if he should push his luck and ask for an MFC... :) -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. The master simply replied, "Mu." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message