From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 23 00:43:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA03607 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:43:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ujf.ujf-grenoble.fr (ujf.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.232.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA03602 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:43:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Gilles.Bruno@ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: from antigua.ujf-grenoble.fr (adm-bruno.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.232.177]) by ujf.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA03503 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 09:42:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <4.1.19981023093637.00af1df0@adm.ujf-grenoble.fr> X-Sender: bruno@adm.ujf-grenoble.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 09:41:23 +0200 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Gilles Bruno Subject: nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi everyone, we tested yesterday the old nestea v2 against a brand new 3.0-Release : it has prooved to be effective against it (the box rebooted - invalid page fault while in kernel mode). The same test against 2.2.[6,7]-Release didn't harm at all. Am I missing something ? some sysctl ? a special kernel config ? Let us know... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message