From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Feb 4 15:35: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6BA37B4BD for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020204233438.YOKL26243.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:34:38 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g14NYct37816; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:34:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200202042334.g14NYct37816@bmah.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Hiten Pandya Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/34606 [PATCH] In-reply-to: <200202041710.g14HA1v12049@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200202041710.g14HA1v12049@freefall.freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to Hiten Pandya message dated "Mon, 04 Feb 2002 09:10:01 -0800." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:34:38 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If memory serves me right, Hiten Pandya wrote: > problem is resolved, as I have submitted a patch > as a followup to this PR. I've fixed the typo. I don't mean to degrade your efforts to improve our documentation, but let me point out that in this particular case, it was easier for a committer (me) to edit the file manually than to transfer the PR containing the diff and run patch(1). When a change spans multiple lines, and might involve moving words around, *that's* when having the diff is more useful, because it reduces the possibility of error when applying it. For a case like that, a follow-up patch can be quite helpful. Thanks in any case! > A not-busy committer > will apply it soon ;) Based on the committers I know, I'm convinced there's no such thing as a "not-busy committer". :-) Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message