Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 02:02:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Porter's Handbook category violations Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006080155130.26473-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000601232048.K32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> SSLtelnet/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> pipsecd/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
Should be moved - all of the other encrypted network ports are in
security. Well, tund isn't, but that one should also move (and gain a
security category).
> iplog/Makefile:CATEGORIES= security
Probably okay in net - the DESCR makes it sound like it's not just an IDS
system (like e.g snort is)
> libnids/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
This one is also dubious - the name calls it an IDS component, but it's
actually an IP packet processing tool. I'd say both of them can stay where
they are.
> queso/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
This one should be along side nmap, which is in security
> relay/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> smbtcpdump/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> sniffit/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> socks5/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> tcpshow/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
> telserv/Makefile:CATEGORIES= net security
I have no complaints with these.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006080155130.26473-100000>