Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 May 2016 00:44:18 +0200
From:      Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Best practice for high availability ZFS pool
Message-ID:  <AF7C7C50-B435-48BA-8069-1AB85D2F2B0F@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <284D58D1-1C62-4519-A46B-7D0E8326B86B@ultra-secure.de>
References:  <5E69742D-D2E0-437F-B4A9-A71508C370F9@FreeBSD.org> <284D58D1-1C62-4519-A46B-7D0E8326B86B@ultra-secure.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]

> 16 maj 2016 kl. 16:52 skrev Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>:
> 
> 
>> Am 16.05.2016 um 12:08 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We need to set up a ZFS pool with redundance. The main goal is high availability - uptime.
>> 
>> I can see a few of paths to follow.
>> 
>> 1. HAST + ZFS
>> 
>> 2. Some sort of shared storage, two machines sharing a JBOD box.
>> 
>> 3. ZFS replication (zfs snapshot + zfs send | ssh | zfs receive)
>> 
>> 4. using something else than ZFS, even a different OS if required.
> 
> 
> 
> There’s always GlusterFS.
> Recently ported to FreeBSD and available as net/gulsterfs (10.3 recommended, AFAIK).
> 
> At work, we use it on Ubuntu - but not with so much data.
> On Linux, I’d use it on top of XFS.
> 
> For our Cloud-Storage, we went with ScaleIO (which is Linux only).
> 
> You need more than two nodes with Gluster, though (for production use)
> I think my co-worker said four at least.

Yeah, it is interesting, but as you say, you really create a RAID5 setup at least.

> 
> If you have the money and don’t mind Linux, ScaleIO is probably the best you can buy at the moment.
> While licensed at the GByte-Level (yeah, EMC…) it can be used free of charge, unsupported.

Yeah that is definitely an option.

We already have an infrastructure based on ZFS, and I am not sure I do trust ZFS on Linux?

Palle


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXOk1CAAoJEDQn0sf36UlsT6MIALIVeD599KCAcpNS0ogBGxK3
a9SOuA/eUUTrsuMqrbvxdBWlvzmOF3IkalgjRpVzuCrup2Ukaq7qxpMPmxVBXylM
dNDiLi6aVU++vlfBbnTJRBrY8HNG2ZhCKBd+r83gCyo6SAPOoYtHEUjLZC/OYhVv
MmBCarS41VD1c/VvildV0inJtLwPeK/ltQb4V39DBuMGKoDYq//cPJqzw4PoPns1
i+M8JS7r70AAanh6QO73gUHr3cTvztwVVNPgjROWispmboZ/Hh6im+dyWwmegDSW
JMV8nlUPG2urq1HukcY1poV3OdY/sWVuO8X8t4F1thEOCeLF5wsf8aL1PhGaXCA=
=0v7N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AF7C7C50-B435-48BA-8069-1AB85D2F2B0F>