Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 00:44:18 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org> To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practice for high availability ZFS pool Message-ID: <AF7C7C50-B435-48BA-8069-1AB85D2F2B0F@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <284D58D1-1C62-4519-A46B-7D0E8326B86B@ultra-secure.de> References: <5E69742D-D2E0-437F-B4A9-A71508C370F9@FreeBSD.org> <284D58D1-1C62-4519-A46B-7D0E8326B86B@ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_7E2DA032-0BE8-495C-95AE-5A80E8AB857A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > 16 maj 2016 kl. 16:52 skrev Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>: >=20 >=20 >> Am 16.05.2016 um 12:08 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> We need to set up a ZFS pool with redundance. The main goal is high = availability - uptime. >>=20 >> I can see a few of paths to follow. >>=20 >> 1. HAST + ZFS >>=20 >> 2. Some sort of shared storage, two machines sharing a JBOD box. >>=20 >> 3. ZFS replication (zfs snapshot + zfs send | ssh | zfs receive) >>=20 >> 4. using something else than ZFS, even a different OS if required. >=20 >=20 >=20 > There=E2=80=99s always GlusterFS. > Recently ported to FreeBSD and available as net/gulsterfs (10.3 = recommended, AFAIK). >=20 > At work, we use it on Ubuntu - but not with so much data. > On Linux, I=E2=80=99d use it on top of XFS. >=20 > For our Cloud-Storage, we went with ScaleIO (which is Linux only). >=20 > You need more than two nodes with Gluster, though (for production use) > I think my co-worker said four at least. Yeah, it is interesting, but as you say, you really create a RAID5 setup = at least. >=20 > If you have the money and don=E2=80=99t mind Linux, ScaleIO is = probably the best you can buy at the moment. > While licensed at the GByte-Level (yeah, EMC=E2=80=A6) it can be used = free of charge, unsupported. Yeah that is definitely an option. We already have an infrastructure based on ZFS, and I am not sure I do = trust ZFS on Linux? Palle --Apple-Mail=_7E2DA032-0BE8-495C-95AE-5A80E8AB857A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXOk1CAAoJEDQn0sf36UlsT6MIALIVeD599KCAcpNS0ogBGxK3 a9SOuA/eUUTrsuMqrbvxdBWlvzmOF3IkalgjRpVzuCrup2Ukaq7qxpMPmxVBXylM dNDiLi6aVU++vlfBbnTJRBrY8HNG2ZhCKBd+r83gCyo6SAPOoYtHEUjLZC/OYhVv MmBCarS41VD1c/VvildV0inJtLwPeK/ltQb4V39DBuMGKoDYq//cPJqzw4PoPns1 i+M8JS7r70AAanh6QO73gUHr3cTvztwVVNPgjROWispmboZ/Hh6im+dyWwmegDSW JMV8nlUPG2urq1HukcY1poV3OdY/sWVuO8X8t4F1thEOCeLF5wsf8aL1PhGaXCA= =0v7N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_7E2DA032-0BE8-495C-95AE-5A80E8AB857A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AF7C7C50-B435-48BA-8069-1AB85D2F2B0F>