From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 01:43:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940516A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:43:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D2A43D41 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9O1hZuW003604; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:43:36 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200410232056.i9NKuKt24614@windsor.research.att.com> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC22021E005B@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20041020062653.GA8027@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw> <200410232056.i9NKuKt24614@windsor.research.att.com> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:43:34 -0400 To: Bill Fenner From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: clsung@tw.freebsd.org cc: chris@sigd.net Subject: Re: Ports: devel/svn dies at devel/apr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:43:37 -0000 At 1:56 PM -0700 10/23/04, Bill Fenner wrote: >Warning: subversion guys say that building with apr-1.0 changes >svn in an incompatible way, so to keep svn ABI compatability, >svn-1.x needs to be built with apr-0.9. > >http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-09/0178.shtml > >I'm not completely sure which interface is affected, I just >came across this issue while researching on my own why subversion >wasn't building right. That web page mentions: 2. Apply the patch appended to this email (which is r10438 of subversion trunk, and is expected to be present in 1.1.0rc3 and later). If the fix was in 1.1.0rc3, then I wonder if we are safe with the version installed by the (fixed) FreeBSD port, which is 1.1.1. Me, I am just starting out with subversion, so I do not have much to test against it. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu