From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 22:07:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13EE1065675; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547458FC1A; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so10677864vcb.13 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:07:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gWVDyTu8QT1JEIIMm5xnjCqI4F49O3bgJ+qKnmwoO7U=; b=H3qOKZ1kMMtuHvXvndvZQy+ys8TDRSeh2p3ctNHwPSLdSLL6oPEX8ZqY6UNQQe40t9 HsjukqjEs//JPQX2y4bhSfbD3ZhrGKaCxjh0OqnYyr0bh++YZjAzC5c7u4uLLxMcN8A2 PXJIpahThItOUBziEiDbMCWu6Z1WYgE7p1tl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.232.10 with SMTP id js10mr6185709vcb.2.1324505269686; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:07:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.158.104 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:07:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201112211700.42772.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201112211716.pBLHGhDH078507@svn.freebsd.org> <201112211700.42772.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:07:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zITTYWdgukXCc2FJNS1KPz9hKtA Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: svn commit: r228785 - in head/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal: ar5210 ar5211 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:07:51 -0000 On 21 December 2011 14:00, John Baldwin wrote: > I agree it should be reviewed, but if you are seriously depending on > the fact that the shifted values are beyond the edge of the word boundary > and so the result "wraps" to zero, then I'd question the sanity of your code. I agree, but this is all "there be dragons" :) adrian