From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan  5 15:43:53 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F934DC
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jan 2013 15:43:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFE11DE
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jan 2013 15:43:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r05FhpGg014039;
 Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:51 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r05Fhpel014036;
 Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:51 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:51 -0700 (MST)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pkg_libchk and lib/compat (was: Re: Notes on upgrades after
 libpcre update)
In-Reply-To: <CA+7WWSedqju=XDHWv1qTPeknmii11+JvdUyaBq__N-1HK-mgUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301050840390.13911@wonkity.com>
References: <CAN6yY1u_9srcrtj4zENdN=TEr2gEkVBQOgvOUQN2btMSCHHv1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121214142537.4ef00e1b53a7c55bffabdc63@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAN6yY1u8WCMMayjWfzcDTDvmL85utJ9F9aH1d_giwYE7Nw1BNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50E7D49A.7060207@passap.ru>
 <CA+7WWSedqju=XDHWv1qTPeknmii11+JvdUyaBq__N-1HK-mgUg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:43:51 -0700 (MST)
Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:43:53 -0000

On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> wrote:
>> 05.01.2013 09:09, Kevin Oberman ?????:
>>
>>> pkg_libchk does not count old libraries in
>>> the compat folder, so it will still report the problem ports even
>>> though you use '-w'.
>>
>> Are you sure? From PKG_LIBCHK(1):
>> -----
>> DESCRIPTION
>>      The pkg_libchk script uses pkg_info(1), ldd(1) and readelf(1) to check
>>      whether a package is linked against missing libraries or libraries
>> resid-
>>      ing in /usr/local/lib/compat and its subfolders.
>>
>> OPTIONS
>> [...]
>>     -n --no-compat
>>              This deactivates detecting compat libraries in
>>              /usr/local/lib/compat as missing libraries.
>> -----
>
> It certainly does look at the compat -directories by default and
> that's the correct thing to do.

Yes.  Because it considers links to libraries in compat to be a problem, 
old libraries there don't fool it.