From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 30 19:10:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D5616A401 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A3013C44C for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133281A4D80; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E229451446; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:10:11 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Message-ID: <20070430191011.GA66625@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4635907D.3020201@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4635907D.3020201@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install fails because / is not writeable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:10:12 -0000 On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:45:17AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write something in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into /etc/group. > > On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine during a portupgrade and fail during install, leaving most of the port installed, but unregistered (i.e. the package database is broken). > > I think such ports should set something like USE_WRITE_SLASH=yes and refuse to install if / is not writeable. I don't think this is something we should support in ports - that way lies madness (what about systems with non-writable /var? What about systems with /etc on a md? etc). Kris