Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:38:02 +0200 From: Marian Hettwer <Mh@kernel32.de> To: Marian Hettwer <Mh@kernel32.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4-iconbox doesn't start Message-ID: <4084E16A.6090209@kernel32.de> In-Reply-To: <4083E4EF.6090601@kernel32.de> References: <4083B346.3040708@kernel32.de> <49279.192.168.0.105.1082383199.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <4083DE92.9020506@kernel32.de> <49555.192.168.0.105.1082385176.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <4083E4EF.6090601@kernel32.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Marian Hettwer wrote: > > > Julien Gabel wrote: > >> Update your ports tree and upgrade all your xfce packages using the >> '-rR' of portupgrade(1) in order to avoid old dependancies. >> > I'll do so and give it a try :) > result: xfce4-iconbox is still core dumping. I got only one error after the portupgrade -rR run, this was a "compile error" in gtk-2.2.4. Although gtk-2.4.0 compiled fine... pkg_info shows that iconbox is still linked against gtk-2.2.4_1 [mhettwer@acchilles] <~> $ pkg_info /var/db/pkg/gtk-2.2.4_1/|grep iconbox xfce4-iconbox-4.0.5 Does it make sense that it's also linked against gtk-2.4.0 ??? [mhettwer@acchilles] <~> $ pkg_info /var/db/pkg/gtk-2.4.0/|grep iconbox xfce4-iconbox-4.0.5 I doubt... I'm still a little bit confused ... best regards, Marian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4084E16A.6090209>